I advise companies that need to change while staying capable of acting. Every mandate starts from my client’s situation — not from a methodology.

Working session on the objectives system (illustration, AI-generated)

Service areas

Transformation initiatives. Support for change initiatives from diagnosis to anchoring: target picture, programme architecture, steering, and communication towards the organisation. Typical situations: a business model changes and the organisation still follows the old one; an initiative has been approved but nobody has thought the implementation through; several initiatives compete for the same people.

Working on the role and decision model (illustration, AI-generated)

Organisation design and governance. Reordering roles, decision rights and governance bodies — where responsibilities are unclear, decisions stall, or the structure no longer fits the business. I establish how decisions are actually made, not how the organisation chart says they are, and work out with the leadership team a role and decision model down to the level of the contested individual cases.

Implementation support. Working with the leadership team through the phase in which a decision has to become lived practice. Where steering instruments are needed — objective systems, prioritisation or planning routines — I introduce them within that process: not to be learned, but to make the pending decisions with them.

Approach

Evaluation of an assessment: response distributions from a leadership survey (illustration, AI-generated)

Assessment. Conversations with the people involved, observation of ongoing committee work, a review of the steering documents. The result: a robust description of the current situation, including the places where it jams.

Target model and concept. Worked out with the leadership team, not presented to it. The result: a decision paper for executive management — roles, decision rights, governance logic, transition plan.

Implementation. Support for the introduction on real business: ongoing planning, pending decisions, emerging conflicts.

Effectiveness. Verified against the issues that had stalled before the mandate.

What a typical mandate looks like

Leadership team in conversation (illustration, AI-generated)

An industrial company merges two business units. A year later the old structures persist in practice: overlapping responsibilities, competing plans, decisions regularly travelling upwards. The mandate: an assessment, and a decision and role model for the merged unit. I talk with the leaders of both original units, sit in on the leadership meetings, and reconstruct past escalations; on that basis the role and decision model takes shape with the leadership team, and I stay to support its introduction. The outcome: decisions that used to be escalated as a matter of routine are made within the unit again.

How we work together

I work on a mandate basis. After an initial conversation you receive a proposal stating the starting situation, objectives, deliverables, timeline, and fees on a per-day or per-project basis. The client is the company. The scope and content of a mandate are not fixed in advance; they follow from the assessment.

What I do not offer

No open seminars, no courses with a fixed curriculum, no certifications, no teaching materials, no examinations. My work takes place within a company’s mandate, on that company’s specific situation.

Request an initial conversation